Springe direkt zu Inhalt

Master Thesis - Measuring and Comparing User Convenience in Smart Home Devices: Methods, Metrics, and User Perspectives

Voraussetzungen

This topic is well-suited for students with an interest in Human-Centered Computing (HCC) and smart home technologies. It is strongly recommended that students have prior experience with empirical research methods — for example, through successful completion of courses such as Human-Centered Computing, Telematics, Embedded Systems Architecture and/or the Microprocessor Lab. Basic familiarity with survey design, qualitative analysis, usability testing will be beneficial.

Fach
Computer Science
Abschluss
Master of Science (M.Sc.)

Inhalt

Measuring and Comparing User Convenience in Smart Home Devices: Methods, Metrics, and User Perspectives

Objective:

This Master’s thesis aims to investigate how “convenience” — one of the main selling points of smart home technology — can be systematically defined, measured, and compared across different device types and use cases. Building on a heterogeneous collection of smart devices (e.g., smart lights, locks, smoke detectors, appliances, irrigation systems), the work will develop a conceptual and empirical framework for evaluating user-perceived convenience. A key part of the thesis will be the design and execution of one or more user surveys or structured interviews to collect qualitative and/or quantitative data from real users.

Potential Work Packages (not exhaustive):

  • Literature review – analyze existing research on smart home usability, perceived value, and convenience-related metrics
  • Device classification – identify and group smart home devices based on functionality, interaction patterns, and automation levels
  • Definition of convenience dimensions – develop a structured model of convenience (e.g., time saved, ease of use, control, reliability, context-awareness)
  • Design of empirical study – develop questionnaires or interview guides targeting everyday users of smart devices
  • Study execution – conduct user surveys and/or structured interviews to gather data on subjective convenience across multiple devices or use cases
  • Data analysis – apply qualitative and/or statistical methods to identify trends, patterns, and differences in perceived convenience
  • Comparison framework – propose a method to evaluate and rank devices based on user feedback and usage context
  • Critical reflection – assess limitations, generalizability, and implications of the findings for smart home design and adoption

Optional Extensions (depending on time and interest):

  • Correlate convenience scores with technical metrics such as setup time, automation depth, or power consumption
  • Explore cultural, demographic, or contextual factors that influence convenience perception
  • Apply the model to real-world smart home scenarios or user profiles (e.g., elderly users, tech-savvy households)
  • Suggest practical design recommendations for manufacturers or platform developers based on user insights
  • Build a prototype tool for structured convenience evaluation across smart home systems

Note:

This topic is well-suited for students with an interest in Human-Centered Computing (HCC) and smart home technologies. It is strongly recommended that students have prior experience with empirical research methods — for example, through successful completion of courses such as Human-Centered Computing, Telematics, Embedded Systems Architecture and/or the Microprocessor Lab. Basic familiarity with survey design, qualitative analysis, usability testing will be beneficial. If you’re interested, please get in touch via e-mail to schedule a meeting where we can discuss the topic in more detail and align on the scope.