Dipl. Inform. Julia Schenk (research associate)

Institute of Computer Science
Software Engineering Working Group

Freie Universität Berlin
Takustr. 9, Room 008
14195 Berlin

E-Mail: julia.schenk@fu-berlin.de


My research is concerned with the process of Distributed Pair Programming (DPP) compared to Pair Programming (PP). In particular I am interested in the different process phenomena of DPP compared to PP and their consequences concerning the fitness for use of Distributed Pair Programming.

In the PP (face-to-face) setting the parties involved perceive social and implicit situative aspects like the emotional state or the focus of attention of their programming mate as well as his explicit behaviour in general and in the shared workspace. These so-called awareness information are perceived intuitively for the most part, constitute the basis for one's own actions, and are fundamental for an efficient collaboration. Furthermore the participants are unrestricted in their verbal and nonverbal communication.

Due to the spacial distribution in DPP the parties are coupled in the workspace via a groupware for real-time editing, but each participant has his own monitor and input devices (mouse and keyboard). As a result on the one hand the participants do not automatically have the same viewport, nor are they necessarily aware of their programming mate's location and actions in the workspace. The natural channels of perception and communication are not available. During their collaboration the participants are restricted to the communication channels and awareness information provided by the collaboration tool. On the other hand due to their autarkic workspace the participants are less coupled and therefore more flexible during their collaboration. Whenever necessary they can explore separately in the workspace and find together.

This leads to the following questions:
  • To which extend the lack of (nonverbal) communication channels and awareness information has an impact on the DPP process?
  • How one could overcome these difficulties either through appropriate behavioral patterns of the programming mates or through provided information by the collaboration tool?
  • When it is possible to extract advantages from the increased flexibility of DPP?

Testbed for my DPP research is Saros (http://www.saros-project.org), an Open Source Eclipse plugin for distributed collaborative software development, which is developed by the Software Engineering Working Group.



Courses 2014

Courses 2013

Courses 2012

Courses 2011

Courses 2010

Courses 2009

for more information see Courses of the Software Engineering Working Group

Supervision of Theses

Finished Type Title pdf
2013-XX Diploma Verbesserung der „First Contact Experience“ für angehende Saros-Entwickler
2013-04 Bachelor Evaluierung einer multimodal bedienbaren und personalisierten Kalenderanwendung auf Basis des mobilen Dialogsystems des DFKI
2012-11 Master Verbesserung der Usability von Saros unter Verwendung eines User-Centered Design Ansatzes pdf
2012-08 Bachelor Überarbeitung der Saros Website nach dem User-Centered Design pdf
2012-05 Master Benutzerzentrierte Entwicklung eines Nutzungskonzepts für das Saros-Whiteboard unter Berücksichtigung der Unterstützung von Grafiktabletts pdf
2012-04 Diploma Prüfung und Verbesserung der Usability von Saros im produktiven Einsatz pdf
2011-11 Bachelor Verbesserung der User Experience in Saros pdf
2011-09 Bachelor Evaluation von Präsenzverfahren in Saros pdf
2011-05 Master Verbesserung der Out-Of-Box-Experience in Saros mittels Heuristischer Evaluation und Usability-Tests pdf
2011-02 Bachelor Ideen und Alternativen zur Gestaltung der Saros-Benutzeroberfläche pdf
2010-07 Bachelor Analyse und Erweiterung der VoIP-Funktionalität in Saros pdf
2010-03 Diploma Die Einführung von Saros in Open-Source-Software-Projekten pdf

for more information see Thesis topics of the Software Engineering Working Group
Topic revision: r23 - 05 May 2017, FranzZieris
  • Printable version of this topic (p) Printable version of this topic (p)