You are here: ABI » LectureWiki » AdvancedAlgorithms » QuantProtP4

Page QuantProtP4

This is the project page of the quantitative proteomics group.

Students

Mail an alle Gruppenmitglieder: AA2010SS-QuantProt bei lists.spline.de

Name email
Christian Hoppe christian.hoppe@fu-berlin.de
Kersten Döring kdoering@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Stefan Mendt mendtste@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Christoph Standfuß christoph.standfuss@inf.fu-berlin.de
Peter Moor moor@inf.fu-berlin.de
Maria Kruegle mariadg@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Anna Kosenko annakriv@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Matthias Kluge mkluge@inf.fu-berlin.de
Felix Mattes mattesf@inf.fu-berlin.de

Literature

Initial reading (this should be read by all)

In this paper you find an overview of label-free quantitative approaches. In addition to label free approaches there are numerous labeling techniques.

Apart from quantitation, peptide and protein ID are another important topic, which we will discuss. Most database search engines are based on the spectrum graph, which was initially introduced by Dancik et al in this paper.

For the core lecture you should read the Dancik paper.

Further reading

Here you find material that is connected in the quantitative analysis of proteomics data.

Exercises

Exercise on peak detection

The project

Proposal outline

  • Signal processing
    • Overview - low-level preprocessing
    • Precision, accuracy and resolution
    • Peak picking
    • Isotopic patterns

  • Peptide feature detection
    • Alignment of LC-MS data
    • database approaches

  • Peptid ID
    • de novo sequencing
    • spectrum graph

Analysis/Programming Projects

Possible projects

Please note, that if you are interested in one of those we still have to work out the details. These are some ideas.

  1. Comparing elution profiles [Bielow](Details) (Stefan, Peter) Elution profiles of features are usually roughly gaussian shaped and correlate if they stem from the same analyte. This can happen due to multiple charge variants as observed in ESI or adduction of salt ions. The goal of this project is to compare elution profiles based a correlation measure, given a list of corresponding features.
  2. emPAI Status: finished [Andreotti](Details) (Anna) The "exponentially modified protein abundance index" can be used to quantify proteins based on the peptides that were observed. This also involves prediction of "proteotypic" peptides (the ones that ionize well) using machine learning techniques. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15958392)
  3. Simulation of PTM's Status: finished [Bielow](Christian,Kersten) (Details) AMS 3.0 is a software using artificial neural networks and voting to predict modification sites. Predicting PTMs in simulated experiments would add another dimension of realism to the results. (http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/210/abstract)
  4. Mass fingerprinting [Bielow](Details)(Christoph) :To get a feeling for how "unique" a certain peptide mass is, try to digest (in-silico) a proteome (e.g. from human) using trypsin. How many peptides are unique to a single protein? Given a mass precision of x ppm, how many peptides are uniquely identifyable? What happens we additionally allow 1 or 2 PTMs? …
  5. Baseline estimation [Bielow](Matthias) One of the crucial steps in MALDI data processing, an algorithm by Williams et al seems promising (http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1167394)

 

This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback